Have we lost our minds?
Ok. I am reading all kinds of things all over the news, and even more all over from comments that people have about this issue. And, everyone seems to be twisting this issue to whatever side they are on. The Republicans are pushing their agenda too hard and we can't approve their budget. The Democrats are becoming the party of "no" and won't compromise. The President wants to ensure that the military won't get paid during the shutdown. Blah, blah, blah. Everyone has something to say, but none of it seems to be intellige - wait - I'm not getting paid?!?!
As you all know, I am military. My family's sole source of income is from that military pay. So, it would seem, I have a vested interest in them making a budget that works. I should be going crazy right now. I should be so angry with politicians and their evil Washington ways, right? I'm not. And you shouldn't be, either. Let's examine the issue so that I can tell you why I am not ready to protest everything right now.
Government Budget 101
I think we need to start with a basic understanding of how government budgets work and why they are such a hot political thing. It starts way down in some budget committee in the House of Representatives. They go through (as far as I know this usually starts around August) and write up a budget for the government for the next year. They put it out there for a vote, and then politicians begin adding to it. Pet projects, money for their states to keep their voters happy, stuff promised to lobbyists, etc. Some of it is not bad stuff. Some of it is bankrupting the country. But that is a discussion for another day. It gets voted on, and if passed, then it goes to the Senate. Same thing happens there, and then if passed, then the President signs it if he agrees and then it is law and the country can continue to run. If not, well, we are beginning to see the fallout from it right now.
So, how does passing the budget really change the way money flows? Well, once the budget gets passed, money then gets deposited into accounts and then the different departments then distribute accordingly to agencies who then distribute it down, etc. If the budget doesn't get passed, the money doesn't flow, and then people aren't paid. So, by not passing one simple bill, the effects are seen everywhere. And the country won't function like that. That means it's time to panic, right? I mean, this is the end of our country! Why is everyone only talking about some parks shutting down?
Politicians use certain stop-gap measures to keep important things functioning. They pass other, smaller budget bills to extend deadlines for coming up with budgets, they make special bills to fund certain vital things, and they in general, spend money that isn't quite on the books yet, but once the budget goes through, it will be. This process is very complex, and understanding government budgeting is something that I don't think anyone can fully say they completely get it. However, the key point I want you to take away here is that lawmakers have to work to keep things going.
What is going on right now? Why is the news telling me that Obama doesn't want our military paid? Why does it say that Republicans are holding out on a budget deal for "pennies"? Why can't they just talk about what is going on? This is all part of the political pandering that I hate so much. They are going at each other right now so that one of the parties can come out of this as the "hero" and win more votes. That is what all the talk is about. But I bet you already figured that out. What you need is someone to cut through the headlines and tell you what is happening.
The President doesn't want to pay
Right now, Obama is sitting up there in the White House praying that he doesn't have to pay us military folks. He hates us so much that he wishes stress and torture upon us and our families. Now, let's think about that for a minute. Even if this were true (which I really believe it isn't - especially with the work of Michelle Obama), how would that make any sense as far as trying to protect this nation and get re-elected? It wouldn't. So why is it in the headlines? What story is really happening? Well, President Obama told his Congress that if they come to him with a half-measure budget, that he would veto. He wants the budget to be complete, and he wants Congress to have pressure to complete it now. So, what about military pay? As far as I can tell, if a bill is passed stating that funds need to go to accounts to make sure military still gets paid, that President Obama will sign it. To veto something like that would be political suicide (and that's why how he personally feels on the subject is irrelevant - you, my fellow voters, have made it that way! Thank you!).
On the same token, Republicans are just trying to hold this budget ransom for just a couple of pennies. They could care less about all the federal employees that won't get paid or all the services that will halt. What's a few dollars, anyway? Well, to the news media, $61 billion dollars may not sound like a lot, but to me it is. Now, in the large scheme of things, $61 billion may not mean much when you are talking about trillions of dollars. But, when I look at it, I think it is more a symbolic thing. That $61 billion stands for a commitment to fixing the budgeting issues of the past, which I think is very important. I think we need to start taking those risks to make sure that the future of this country is viable. We need more of this type of thing happening in Washington, and we need to support those making it happen (and those are on both sides of the aisle - this, when you look at it, is not just a Democrat vs Republican thing). It is tough and it is a struggle. And if I have to go without pay to make our government start taking accountability for the spending it is doing, then so be it (although, after a couple of weeks, my bill collectors may have to go without their pay).
Sacrifice - Can you?
Bottom line, did I create this budget mess? No. Am I going to have to pay for it? Not completely (thank God), but as a collective public, yes. Am I willing to step up and do my part to curb our ridiculous spending? Absolutely. I cannot wait to see the US with a budget surplus again (as long as we do it right). Am I going to have sacrifice everything for this to work? No. Am I willing to? No. But sacrifice is going to be needed from everyone to make this start working the way we want it to work. I would like to say that it's only the people that created this mess that are going to have to clean it up, but it's just not true. We are all going to have to pitch in. Are you ready to do your part?
This is a blog with a bunch of rants by me about the state of our great US country today. I try to give people some information, offer my perspective, and hope that people like it. I will cover any topics that peak my interest. News, government, politics, big business, education, etc.
Friday, April 8, 2011
The Insanity of Budgets
Comments (9)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
Finance
The Insanity of Budgets
2011-04-08T04:34:00-07:00
Unknown
Finance|
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
To balance the budget we need to cut back on some programs, but equally we need to cut back on Business tax loop holes, as well as an increase in Taxes? OOps that's right, I said the "t" word. If we as a country ( and I do) want Social Security , Pell grants, Alternative energy subsidies, 3 wars, hi-speed train ! It cost money folks, Payup folks or move to Mexico where they have one of the lowest tax rates in the world? STick en up Amigo no Police here, too expensive!
My suggestion to Republicans, is to be careful.. for at some point, if you take away, from the working class too much, their will be yet another back lash .
fredcanfly 18p · 733 weeks ago
First let me take the opportunity to say great comments. I started this blog just to spark these types of discussions. Please continue to comment, as I think the more we do, the more of a chance we have at coming up with something that works and possibly change our great nation for the better. So, thank you!
Unfortunately, blaming Republicans for this mess isn't going to solve this mess, I don't think. I don't think that they just want to dismantle all social programs (bad for politics and bad for country). My question to you is, however, what kind of tax hike would be OK to pay for all these programs? Who should saddle that bill? Should we put it on the rich? Make them pay for being successful? Should we put more taxes to the middle class?
On the other side of things, I understand you want all of those things, and I want most of them; does the rest of the country want them. Personally, I don't think I want 3 wars. I could care less about a hi-speed train (interstate system works fine for me). I definitely want to spend some money on police, education, alternative energy, and social programs that make sense for the poor (I am working on a health care post that will explain some of why I don't think what we have out there makes sense). I am talking about something that encourages the poor to work on becoming not poor and get off of the social programs (which I think should be a stop-gap as opposed to a way of life for most people - there are certain disabled people that just cannot work and we cannot ignore them).
My suggestions are to government in general. I don't think the differences between Democrat and Republican are too stark anymore. I see both as saying a lot of things, but when they hold power, they show what their true colors are. I think that Democrat vs Republican system is tired and worn out. It encourages people to walk party lines instead of focusing on what is really going on. I say may the best man/woman for the job win the job and then do what they said they would. I don't care where they come from, what party affiliation they have, what their gender, race, or religious preference is. If they can do the job best, then let's hire them. After all, isn't that what that American dream is all about?
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
fredcanfly 18p · 733 weeks ago
The problem comes when we try to figure out how to pay for it. Do we force corporations to pay for their workers' retirement (how many have taken their jobs elsewhere already)? Do we make the government pay for their retirement (1. Because that has been working so well already... 2. Then we basically saddle the younger generation with the older generation's retirement)? I personally think that people who can take care of themselves, should. So, you teach them how to take care of retirement, and then you let them take care of it. Is that the best way? I really can't say 100% that it is, but I like the idea.
I think the death commission was a lot of media hoopla and political jockeying. I know I am tired of hearing about it. I do think that your mother should get a new hip, but everything costs money. I think getting off oil should be this country's 3rd priority. Right behind education and fixing the budget issues and the debt. Cell coverage and broad band would be nice, but I would like us to fix education and social programs first. And I know the Australian tax rate pretty well, actually. My daughter and my parents just spent a couple weeks down there last year (something that my father worked and saved for years to be able to give to my mother - two things that more people could learn the value of, work and savings).
None of these problems are simple problems. Each one of them have many solutions. It's finding the right ones for this country that is going to be the most difficult. We have spent so much time in this country trying to divide on party lines, attack each other, and jockey for elections. I think it has caused us to lose sight of the issues. I know that none of this will change overnight, but a step in the right direction would be nice. I don't know for sure that's what the budget holdup/government shutdown thing was, but at least I heard people talking about spending, and saw people standing up for something (whether it was what they actually believed or if it was just another party line, I don't know). It has been a while since I saw people willing to jeopardize their political careers over a policy. But of course, the country's reaction to that was negative, so I don't know if we will see it again. I want to support those that are willing to stand their ground when they know they are right, and compromise when it makes sense to do so (like if they find out they aren't right on a position). I love how the news media makes it out to be a bad thing if you change your position. I mean, yes, if you change because someone paid you to, or if you are constantly changing all of your positions, then there is a problem. But getting new information, and then changing what you think based on that information; well - I just call that intelligence. So, this comment got a little off track, but we essentially just need debates with people willing to say what is in their hearts.
And I believe that is what you did, Ivan. And I thank you for it. We need more people like you lending your voice to this debate. And we need more forums for debate. I don't necessarily agree with everything you are saying, but I know that you are saying it because that is truly how you think. And I have all the respect in the world for that.
ivan1949 26p · 733 weeks ago
fredcanfly 18p · 733 weeks ago
That being said, we (as individuals) need to do better at managing our personal finances and need to donate more (this is one area that I could definitely improve on in my own life). We need to donate our time, our money, and our knowledge to help others in need; instead of asking the government to do it. Will it happen? I don't know. I really hope that fixing education and getting a population who are well-read and understand the world a bit better might also be more willing to donate of themselves. Those are usually the ones I see doing that more right now. We are going to have some rough times if we are going to get things fixed, and people will have to sacrifice. But, if we can get through it, we will come out a stronger country with stronger individuals.
You may have misunderstood what I was saying about being in a teaching role. When I worked maintenance, there was an old guy there that did much less work than the rest of us. But, he spent most of his time at work teaching us young guys the things he learned over the years. He was a master at a lot of things, and we all learned so much from him. He did do work, and he did go with us whenever we had trouble tickets, but he spent a lot of time teaching us things. That is what I meant by a more teacher role. Maybe more of a manager or supervisor type thing might be a better term for it. I just know that the guys I worked with don't have a clue what to do with a week off and go stir crazy (not that they want to break their backs everyday either), they are just looking for something to do.
So, anyway. You do make some great points and bring up some questions that will be difficult to find a good answer to. But, if we don't ask the questions and discuss them, then we won't ever find the answer to them and we will be failing all future generations.